Does Meritocracy Really Exist?
Introduction: Success, Fairness, and Opportunity
In the past, attempts to achieve success often used unfair methods, where social status, family background, and wealth were used to determine an individual’s capacity. However, modern society offers a different perspective through meritocracy, which is considered fairer because every individual has the same opportunity to achieve success based on their abilities.
So, what is meritocracy? Does it truly exist equally in society? In this article, we will discuss meritocracy, including its advantages and disadvantages.
Why Meritocracy Matters: Lessons from Indonesia
Firstly, we can examine a historical example of why meritocracy is important. During the period of 1965–1998, Indonesia was ruled by President Soeharto, where practices such as nepotism, collusion, and patronage thrived in governance as tools to maintain power.
At that time, the families and relatives of officials were given privileges to pursue careers in government regardless of their leadership abilities. This practice became one of the factors that hindered the realization of good governance and reduced the quality of state governance.
When the quality of governance declines, it automatically affects policies and the welfare of citizens, ultimately leading to a decline in public trust toward the government.
After the downfall of Soeharto in 1998 and the beginning of the Reformasi era, the government issued policies to eradicate the practices of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (KKN) in governance.
By evaluating the situation above, practices such as nepotism and collusion can reduce the quality of governance and limit social progress. One of the solutions offered by modern society to solve this problem is meritocracy, a system that values a person’s abilities and qualities more fairly in achieving success.
"The Indonesian experience shows that power inherited through privilege can weaken institutions and limit social progress."
What Is Meritocracy?
The term “meritocracy” originates from the word merit (from the Latin mereō) and -cracy (from the Ancient Greek kratos, meaning “strength” or “power”).
Meritocracy is a system or perspective that believes an individual’s influence, power, and achievements should depend on their abilities rather than social status, family background, or wealth.
In political systems, meritocracy is often considered fairer, more rational, and more professional because leadership positions are expected to be occupied by capable individuals instead of being inherited through nepotism or privilege.
One of the most significant impacts of meritocratic practices is that they open opportunities for qualified individuals to pursue success and improve their lives without being hindered by social status or wealth.
Overall, meritocracy encourages people to develop their skills, become more competent, and compete based on their abilities rather than personal connections or inherited advantages.
Despite these positive impacts, some people still question whether meritocratic justice truly exists.
The Benefits of a Meritocratic System
Is Meritocracy Really Fair?
Does meritocracy truly provide justice, or does it create a different form of injustice?
Is meritocracy truly fair, or does it actually give rise to a new form of injustice called intellectual elitism? The practice of meritocracy certainly requires skilled, educated, and competent individuals. However, what about inequality in access to education across different regions?
The principle of meritocracy values a person’s abilities and qualities, yet qualified individuals often come from wealthy families who have better access to education. Meanwhile, in some remote areas, access to education is limited, and economic background also becomes an obstacle to receiving equal educational opportunities.
From this situation, we can see inequality in the practice of the meritocratic system because those who have better educational access and financial support have greater opportunities to achieve prosperity. In contrast, those who are financially disadvantaged and have limited access to education have fewer opportunities to improve their quality of life.
Therefore, it could be argued that meritocracy may unintentionally create intellectual inequality within society. Despite these disadvantages, the modern world has become increasingly aware of this issue by providing more equal access to education for people from different backgrounds. In many countries, governments provide free education policies for students as well as financial aid for underprivileged groups.
These efforts aim to ensure that individuals are given a fairer chance to develop their abilities regardless of their economic background.
Conclusion: An Imperfect but Valuable System
Author: Aura Misha
Editor & Publisher: Lucía Lobato
Meritocracy may not be a perfect system. Theoretically, it appears ideal, but in practice it does not always work as expected. However, this does not necessarily mean that meritocracy has failed, because every system has both advantages and disadvantages.
Overall, meritocracy has succeeded in reducing nepotism and providing opportunities for people to improve themselves, become competent, highly skilled, and qualified to compete in the modern world.
© 2026. Unfolding The World. All rights reserved.
Understanding the World, One Story at a Time.
About Us
Our Team
QUICK LINKS